Thijs Römer - the Twitter brother of Sander Graaf Schimmelpenninck - had to bare his bottom because he had taught underage girls - as he thinks of himself, as a "counsellor" - how best to finger.
Now, to me, a scumbag is a scumbag, whether he is of nobility, a BN'er or Koos on the back of the garbage truck, but Römertje is now being massively celebrated because of his status as a famous Dutchman.
Römer is yet another example of the deputy for the stage, who takes the measure of every right-wing Dutchman on twitter, but in the meantime wishes to plant "his" gripping fingers in the genitals of underage girls (oh sorry, innocently telling them how to do it themselves), because he couldn't handle a real woman like Katja Schuurman in married life, and therefore sought refuge with some less "resilient" female specimens.
That Thijsje's life was obviously 'a living hell', because his wife had left him, he was the least known BN'er in his marriage to Katja and he always has to compete with the mythical status of his grandfather, will surely have weighed in the judgment of the - to D66-affiliated - Public Prosecutor, and in the verdict of the - maybe D66? - judge in two weeks.......... because Thijsje is in fact the real victim in this sad case.
That Thijs is a scumbag is indisputable - apologies for the choice of words used - but it is a scumbag that leftist woke society has created, and accepts as such.
In fact, what is the essential difference between Thijs Römer teaching young girls the "pleasures" of fingering in his dusty attic room, and the teaching materials of Spring Tickle Week and certain stories by, for example, a Pim Lammers - author of the Children's Book Week poem - where even toddlers and preschoolers are taught the "pleasures" of sex, and "understanding" of a sexual relationship between adults and minors is cultivated.
There is - gee, how surprising - no difference at all between the transgressive behavior of Thijs Römer, and the transgressive material of spring fever week and writer Pim Lammers, except for the fact that the leftist woke-institutions see the one act as punishable behavior by an individual, and the transgressive material as educationally accepted, in order to educate your child.
If our school system finds it educationally "responsible" to confront toddlers and preschoolers with, among other things, "teaching material" about how they should suck then why does a large part of the Netherlands find it shocking - still rightly so, by the way - and punishable that Thijs Römer is inciting 15-year-old girls to self-gratification?
Are our toddlers and preschoolers aged - say, 4 to 8 years old - so much more mentally stable than adolescents of 15, that they are allowed to be confronted with sexual acts forced upon them, and written down by adults, while their much older peers should be criminally protected from it?
The Daily Standard always opposes Woke as well as creeps like Thijs Römer, whether they are protected by the media and the OM or not. But for that we need YOUR help. Support us via BackMe, donate!, and help us tell the truth about sick Hilversum and to protect our children from perverts!
The Römer case illustrates the hypocrisy, woke-ness and banana republicanism of our judiciary and judiciary, which have held this country hostage for ages.
The individual is still being criminalized for the same offense that leftist woke society sees as educationally accepted, but which in fact amounts to the same criminal behavior.
Whether a child is 4, 6, 8 or 15, they should not be confronted with forced sexual acts. Point.
Place comments
0 Comments
You are currently seeing only the comments you are notified about, if you want to see all comments from this post, click the button below.
Show all comments